Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 504
Filtrar
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(2): e2146519, 2022 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35119463

RESUMO

Importance: Management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in socioeconomically vulnerable patients is suboptimal; better risk factor control could improve CVD outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) targeting CVD risk in community health centers (CHCs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial included 70 CHC clinics randomized to an intervention group (42 clinics; 8 organizations) or a control group that received no intervention (28 clinics; 7 organizations) from September 20, 2018, to March 15, 2020. Randomization was by CHC organization accounting for organization size. Patients aged 40 to 75 years with (1) diabetes or atherosclerotic CVD and at least 1 uncontrolled major risk factor for CVD or (2) total reversible CVD risk of at least 10% were the population targeted by the CDSS intervention. Interventions: A point-of-care CDSS displaying real-time CVD risk factor control data and personalized, prioritized evidence-based care recommendations. Main Outcomes and Measures: One-year change in total CVD risk and reversible CVD risk (ie, the reduction in 10-year CVD risk that was considered achievable if 6 key risk factors reached evidence-based levels of control). Results: Among the 18 578 eligible patients (9490 [51.1%] women; mean [SD] age, 58.7 [8.8] years), patients seen in control clinics (n = 7419) had higher mean (SD) baseline CVD risk (16.6% [12.8%]) than patients seen in intervention clinics (n = 11 159) (15.6% [12.3%]; P < .001); baseline reversible CVD risk was similarly higher among patients seen in control clinics. The CDSS was used at 19.8% of 91 988 eligible intervention clinic encounters. No population-level reduction in CVD risk was seen in patients in control or intervention clinics; mean reversible risk improved significantly more among patients in control (-0.1% [95% CI, -0.3% to -0.02%]) than intervention clinics (0.4% [95% CI, 0.3% to 0.5%]; P < .001). However, when the CDSS was used, both risk measures decreased more among patients with high baseline risk in intervention than control clinics; notably, mean reversible risk decreased by an absolute 4.4% (95% CI, -5.2% to -3.7%) among patients in intervention clinics compared with 2.7% (95% CI, -3.4% to -1.9%) among patients in control clinics (P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The CDSS had low use rates and failed to improve CVD risk in the overall population but appeared to have a benefit on CVD risk when it was consistently used for patients with high baseline risk treated in CHCs. Despite some limitations, these results provide preliminary evidence that this technology has the potential to improve clinical care in socioeconomically vulnerable patients with high CVD risk. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03001713.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Centros Comunitários de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
5.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2021: 5545297, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34257699

RESUMO

Clinical procedure for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is mainly based on clinical records and short cognitive tests. However, low suspicion and difficulties in understanding test cut-offs make diagnostic accuracy being low, particularly in primary care. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are suitable to design computed aided diagnostic systems because of their features of generating relationships between variables and their learning capability. The main aim pursued in that work is to explore the ability of a hybrid ANN-based system in order to provide a tool to assist in the clinical decision-making that facilitates a reliable MCI estimate. The model is designed to work with variables usually available in primary care, including Minimental Status Examination (MMSE), Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), age, and years of education. It will be useful in any clinical setting. Other important goal of our study is to compare the diagnostic rendering of ANN-based system and clinical physicians. A sample of 128 MCI subjects and 203 controls was selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). The ANN-based system found the optimal variable combination, being AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and clinical utility index (CUI) calculated. The ANN results were compared with those from medical experts which include two family physicians, a neurologist, and a geriatrician. The optimal ANN model reached an AUC of 95.2%, with a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 84.78% and was based on MMSE, FAQ, and age inputs. As a whole, physician performance achieved a sensitivity of 46.66% and a specificity of 91.3%. CUIs were also better for the ANN model. The proposed ANN system reaches excellent diagnostic accuracy although it is based only on common clinical tests. These results suggest that the system is especially suitable for primary care implementation, aiding physicians work with cognitive impairment suspicions.


Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Redes Neurais de Computação , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Disfunção Cognitiva/psicologia , Biologia Computacional , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Diagnóstico por Computador/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Testes Neuropsicológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0253653, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34197503

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To facilitate the demonstration of the prognostic value of radiomics, multicenter radiomics studies are needed. Pooling radiomic features of such data in a statistical analysis is however challenging, as they are sensitive to the variability in scanner models, acquisition protocols and reconstruction settings, which is often unavoidable in a multicentre retrospective analysis. A statistical harmonization strategy called ComBat was utilized in radiomics studies to deal with the "center-effect". The goal of the present work was to integrate a transfer learning (TL) technique within ComBat-and recently developed alternate versions of ComBat with improved flexibility (M-ComBat) and robustness (B-ComBat)-to allow the use of a previously determined harmonization transform to the radiomic feature values of new patients from an already known center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The proposed TL approach were incorporated in the four versions of ComBat (standard, B, M, and B-M ComBat). The proposed approach was evaluated using a dataset of 189 locally advanced cervical cancer patients from 3 centers, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) images, with the clinical endpoint of predicting local failure. The impact performance of the TL approach was evaluated by comparing the harmonization achieved using only parts of the data to the reference (harmonization achieved using all the available data). It was performed through three different machine learning pipelines. RESULTS: The proposed TL technique was successful in harmonizing features of new patients from a known center in all versions of ComBat, leading to predictive models reaching similar performance as the ones developed using the features harmonized with all the data available. CONCLUSION: The proposed TL approach enables applying a previously determined ComBat transform to new, previously unseen data.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/normas , Aprendizado de Máquina/normas , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colo do Útero/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/normas , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/estatística & dados numéricos , Aprendizado de Máquina/estatística & dados numéricos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/normas , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/normas , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 106(12): e5236-e5246, 2021 11 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34160618

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop a machine learning tool to integrate clinical data for the prediction of non-benign thyroid cytology and histology. CONTEXT: Papillary thyroid carcinoma is the most common endocrine malignancy. Since most nodules are benign, the challenge for the clinician is to identify those most likely to harbor malignancy while limiting exposure to surgical risks among those with benign nodules. METHODS: Random forests (augmented to select features based on our clinical measure of interest), in conjunction with interpretable rule sets, were used on demographic, ultrasound, and biopsy data of thyroid nodules from children younger than 18 years at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Accuracy, false-positive rate (FPR), false-negative rate (FNR), and area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) are reported. RESULTS: Our models predict nonbenign cytology and malignant histology better than historical outcomes. Specifically, we expect a 68.04% improvement in the FPR, 11.90% increase in accuracy, and 24.85% increase in AUROC for biopsy predictions in 67 patients (28 with benign and 39 with nonbenign histology). We expect a 23.22% decrease in FPR, 32.19% increase in accuracy, and 3.84% decrease in AUROC for surgery prediction in 53 patients (42 with benign and 11 with nonbenign histology). This improvement comes at the expense of the FNR, for which we expect 10.27% with malignancy would be discouraged from performing biopsy, and 11.67% from surgery. Given the small number of patients, these improvements are estimates and are not tested on an independent test set. CONCLUSION: This work presents a first attempt at developing an interpretable machine learning based clinical tool to aid clinicians. Future work will involve sourcing more data and developing probabilistic estimates for predictions.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Área Sob a Curva , Biópsia por Agulha Fina , Criança , Seguimentos , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 278, 2021 Apr 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827459

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Computerized clinical decision support (CDSS) -digital information systems designed to improve clinical decision making by providers - is a promising tool for improving quality of care. This study aims to understand the uptake of ASMAN application (defined as completeness of electronic case sheets), the role of CDSS in improving adherence to key clinical practices and delivery outcomes. METHODS: We have conducted secondary analysis of program data (government data) collected from 81 public facilities across four districts each in two sates of Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. The data collected between August -October 2017 (baseline) and the data collected between December 2019 - March 2020 (latest) was analysed. The data sources included: digitized labour room registers, case sheets, referral and discharge summary forms, observation checklist and complication format. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate and interrupted time series regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The completeness of electronic case sheets was low at postpartum period (40.5%), and in facilities with more than 300 deliveries a month (20.9%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the introduction of technology yielded significant improvement in adherence to key clinical practices. We have observed reduction in fresh still births rates and asphyxia, but these results were not statistically significant in interrupted time series analysis. However, our analysis showed that identification of maternal complications has increased over the period of program implementation and at the same time referral outs decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates CDSS has a potential to improve quality of intrapartum care and delivery outcome. Future studies with rigorous study design is required to understand the impact of technology in improving quality of maternity care.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perinatal/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Asfixia Neonatal/epidemiologia , Asfixia Neonatal/prevenção & controle , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/normas , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Assistência Perinatal/normas , Assistência Perinatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Natimorto/epidemiologia
9.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 46(3): 738-743, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33768608

RESUMO

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Prescribing errors are the leading cause of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Pharmaceutical validation, defined as the review of drug orders by a pharmacist, associated with clinical decision support (CDS) systems, significantly reduces these errors and adverse drug events. In Belgium, because clinical pharmacy services have limited public financial support, most pharmaceutical validations are performed at the central pharmacy instead of on-ward, by hospital pharmacists doing dispensing activities. In that context, we aimed at evaluating whether the strategy of CDS-guided central validation was the most appropriate method to improve the quality and safety of medicines' use compared to an on-ward pharmaceutical validation. METHODS: Our retrospective observational study was conducted in a Belgian tertiary care hospital, in 2018-2019. Data were extracted from our validation software and pharmacists' charts. The outcomes of the study were the number of pharmaceutical interventions due to the detection of prescribing errors, reasons for interventions, their acceptance rate and their potential clinical impact (according to two blinded experts) in the central pharmacy and on-ward validation groups. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Despite the use of the same CDS, a pharmaceutical intervention following the detection of a prescribing error was made for 2.9% (20/698) of central group patients and 13.3% (93/701) of on-ward patients (χ2  = 49.97, p < 0.001). Interventions made at the central pharmacy (n = 20) mostly relied on CDS-alerts (i.e. drug-drug interaction [25%] or overdosing [20%]) while interventions made on-ward (n = 93) were also for pharmacotherapy optimization (i.e. no valid indication [25%] or inappropriate drug's choice [11%]). The on-ward validation group showed a higher acceptance rate compared to the central group (84% and 65%, respectively [Fisher's test, p = 0.053]). Proportions of interventions with significant or very significant clinical impact were similar between the two groups but as fewer interventions were made centrally, a significant proportion of errors were probably not detected by the central validation. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: On-ward pharmaceutical validation leads to a higher rate of prescribing error detection. Pharmaceutical interventions made by on-ward pharmacists are also better accepted and more relevant, going further than CDS-alerts.


Assuntos
Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Bélgica , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/organização & administração , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Interações Medicamentosas , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/organização & administração , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
10.
Intern Emerg Med ; 16(8): 2251-2259, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742340

RESUMO

Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a diagnostic challenge in emergency medicine. Clinical decision aids (CDAs) like the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC) are sensitive but poorly specific; serial CDA use may improve specificity. The goal of this before-and-after study was to determine if serial use of existing CDAs in a novel diagnostic algorithm safely decreases the use of CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPA). This was a retrospective before-and-after study conducted at an urban ED with 105,000 annual visits. Our algorithm uses PERC, Wells' score, and D-dimer in series, before moving to CTPA. The algorithm was introduced in January, 2017. Use of CDAs and D-dimer in the 24 months pre- and 12 months post-intervention were obtained by chart review. The algorithm's effect on CTPA ordering was assessed by comparing volume 5 years pre- and 3 years post-intervention, adjusted for ED volume. Mean CTPAs per 1000 adult ED visits was 11.1 in the 5 pre-intervention years and 9.9 in the 3 post-intervention years (p < 0.0001). Use of PERC, Wells' score and D-dimer increased from 1.1%, 1.1%, and 28% to 8.8% (p = 0.0002) 8.1% (p = 0.0005), and 35% (p = 0.0066), respectively. Pre-intervention, there were six potentially missed PEs compared to three in the post-intervention period. Introduction of our serial CDA diagnostic algorithm was associated with increased use of CDAs and D-dimer and reduced CTPA rate without an apparent increase in the number of missed PEs. Prospective validation is needed to confirm these results.


Assuntos
Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/normas , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Sobremedicalização/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Algoritmos , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Estudos Controlados Antes e Depois , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/instrumentação , Humanos , Sobremedicalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
11.
Can J Diabetes ; 45(2): 97-104.e2, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046403

RESUMO

In this study, we identify existing interactive knowledge translation tools that could help patients and health-care professionals to prevent diabetes complications in the Canadian context. We conducted an environmental scan in collaboration with researchers and 4 patient partners across Canada. We conducted searches among the research team members, their networks and Twitter, and through searches in databases and Google. To be included, interactive knowledge translation tools had to meet the following criteria: used to prevent diabetes complications; used in a real-life setting; used any instructional method or material; had relevance in the Canadian context, written in English or French; developed and/or published by experts in diabetes complications or by a recognized organization; created in 2013 or after; and accessibility online or on paper. Two reviewers independently screened each record for selection and extracted the following data: authorship, objective(s), patients' characteristics, type of diabetes complications targeted, type of knowledge users targeted and tool characteristics. We used simple descriptive statistics to summarize our results. Thirty-one of the 1,700 potentially eligible interactive knowledge translation tools were included in the scan. Tool formats included personal notebook, interactive case study, risk assessment tool, clinical pathway, decision support tool, knowledge quiz and checklist. Diabetes complications targeted by the tools included foot-related neuropathy, cardiovascular diseases, mental disorders and distress and any complications related to diabetes and kidney disease. Our results inform Canadian stakeholders interested in the prevention of diabetes complications to avoid unnecessary duplication, identify gaps in knowledge and support implementation of these tools in clinical and patients' decision-making.


Assuntos
Acesso à Informação , Complicações do Diabetes/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Canadá/epidemiologia , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/provisão & distribuição , Complicações do Diabetes/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Promoção da Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Conhecimento , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/organização & administração , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/estatística & dados numéricos , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Treinamento por Simulação/organização & administração , Treinamento por Simulação/estatística & dados numéricos , Meio Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/métodos , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/organização & administração , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Crit Care ; 24(1): 656, 2020 11 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33228770

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects a large proportion of the critically ill and is associated with worse patient outcomes. Early identification of AKI can lead to earlier initiation of supportive therapy and better management. In this study, we evaluate the impact of computerized AKI decision support tool integrated with the critical care clinical information system (CCIS) on patient outcomes. Specifically, we hypothesize that integration of AKI guidelines into CCIS will decrease the proportion of patients with Stage 1 AKI deteriorating into higher stages of AKI. METHODS: The study was conducted in two intensive care units (ICUs) at University Hospitals Bristol, UK, in a before (control) and after (intervention) format. The intervention consisted of the AKIN guidelines and AKI care bundle which included guidance for medication usage, AKI advisory and dashboard with AKI score. Clinical data and patient outcomes were collected from all patients admitted to the units. AKI stage was calculated using the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) guidelines. Maximum AKI stage per admission, change in AKI stage and other metrics were calculated for the cohort. Adherence to eGFR-based enoxaparin dosing guidelines was evaluated as a proxy for clinician awareness of AKI. RESULTS: Each phase of the study lasted a year, and a total of 5044 admissions were included for analysis with equal numbers of patients for the control and intervention stages. The proportion of patients worsening from Stage 1 AKI decreased from 42% (control) to 33.5% (intervention), p = 0.002. The proportion of incorrect enoxaparin doses decreased from 1.72% (control) to 0.6% (intervention), p < 0.001. The prevalence of any AKI decreased from 43.1% (control) to 37.5% (intervention), p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study demonstrated a significant reduction in AKI progression from Stage 1 and a reduction in overall development of AKI. In addition, a reduction in incorrect enoxaparin dosing was also observed, indicating increased clinical awareness. This study demonstrates that AKI guidelines coupled with a newly designed AKI care bundle integrated into CCIS can impact patient outcomes positively.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/normas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/instrumentação , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Informática Médica/instrumentação , Informática Médica/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
13.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237159, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32760101

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems (CCDSS) have become increasingly important in ensuring patient safety and supporting all phases of clinical decision making. The aim of this study is to evaluate, through a CCDSS, the rate of the laboratory tests overuse and to estimate the cost of the inappropriate requests in a large university hospital. METHOD: In this observational study, hospital physicians submitted the examination requests for the inpatients through a Computerized Physician Order Entry. Violations of the rules in tests requests were intercepted and counted by a CCDSS, over a period of 20 months. Descriptive and inferential statistics (Student's t-test and ANOVA) were made. Finally, the monthly comprehensive cost of the laboratory tests was calculated. RESULTS: During the observation period a total of 5,716,370 requests were analyzed and 809,245 violations were counted. The global rate of overuse was 14.2% ± 3.0%. The most inappropriate exams were Alpha Fetoprotein (85.8% ± 30.5%), Chlamydia trachomatis Nucleic Acid Amplification (48.7% ± 8.8%) and Alkaline Phosphatase (20.3% ± 6.5%). The monthly cost of over-utilization was 56,534€ for basic panel, 14,421€ for coagulation, 4,758€ for microbiology, 432€ for immunology exams. All the exams, generated an estimated avoidable cost of 1,719,337€ (85,967€ per month) for the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the wide variability in over-utilization rates of laboratory tests. For these reasons, the real impact of inappropriateness is difficult to assess, but the generated costs for patients, hospitals and health systems are certainly high and not negligible. It would be desirable for international medical communities to produce a complete panel of prescriptive rules for all the most common laboratory exams that is useful not only to reduce costs, but also to ensure standardization and high-quality care.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/economia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/economia , Hospitais Universitários/economia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
Comput Inform Nurs ; 38(11): 590-596, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732641

RESUMO

With information technology increasingly guiding nursing practice, Doctor of Nursing Practice students must be prepared to use informatics to optimize patient outcomes despite their varied experience and education. Understanding how students' baseline experience affects their mastery of informatics competencies could help faculty design Doctor of Nursing Practice course content. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective descriptive study was to evaluate whether Doctor of Nursing Practice students' baseline informatics experience affected their mastery of four competencies: meaningful use, datasets, e-health, and clinical support systems. Participants were Doctor of Nursing Practice students (n = 55) enrolled in an online informatics course. Participant experience was compared to competency mastery using χ tests. Logistic regression was performed to assess the effect of experience and highest degree obtained on competency mastery. Analysis revealed that participants with meaningful use experience were significantly more likely to master the meaningful use competency than were those without it. Relevant experience did not predict mastery of dataset competencies. Participants with e-health experience were significantly more likely to master the e-health competency (applying e-health resources to vulnerable patients' learning needs). While not significant, a greater percentage of students with clinical support systems experience mastered the clinical support systems competency. Informatics courses might need to be designed to address students' needs based on their experience.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem , Informática em Enfermagem/educação , Estudantes de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Significativo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(5): e205547, 2020 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32469412

RESUMO

Importance: Despite the broad adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems across the continuum of care, safety problems persist. Objective: To measure the safety performance of operational EHRs in hospitals across the country during a 10-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series included all US adult hospitals nationwide that used the National Quality Forum Health IT Safety Measure EHR computerized physician order entry safety test administered by the Leapfrog Group between 2009 and 2018. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2018 to December 1, 2019. Exposure: The Health IT Safety Measure test, which uses simulated medication orders that have either injured or killed patients previously to evaluate how well hospital EHRs could identify medication errors with potential for patient harm. Main Outcomes and Measures: Descriptive statistics for performance on the assessment test over time were calculated at the overall test score level, type of decision support category level, and EHR vendor level. Results: Among 8657 hospital-years observed during the study, mean (SD) scores on the overall test increased from 53.9% (18.3%) in 2009 to 65.6% (15.4%) in 2018. Mean (SD) hospital score for the categories representing basic clinical decision support increased from 69.8% (20.8%) in 2009 to 85.6% (14.9%) in 2018. For the categories representing advanced clinical decision support, the mean (SD) score increased from 29.6% (22.4%) in 2009 to 46.1% (21.6%) in 2018. There was considerable variation in test performance by EHR. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that despite broad adoption and optimization of EHR systems in hospitals, wide variation in the safety performance of operational EHR systems remains across a large sample of hospitals and EHR vendors. Hospitals using some EHR vendors had significantly higher test scores. Overall, substantial safety risk persists in current hospital EHR systems.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Segurança do Paciente , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/normas , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/normas , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/normas , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
17.
Int J Pharm Pract ; 28(5): 473-482, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32390231

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary care prescribers must cope with an increasing number and complexity of considerations. Prescribing decision support systems (DSS) have therefore been developed to assist prescribers. Previous studies have shown that although there is wide variance in the different DSS available within primary care, barriers and facilitators to uptake remain. The Drug Synonyms function ('Synonyms') is a DSS inherent in the commercial electronic medical record system EMIS. Synonyms functionality has been further developed by the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GG&C) Central Prescribing Team to promote safe and cost-effective prescribing; however, it does not support the collection of usage data. As there is no knowledge on the uptake nor on the perceived effect of using Synonyms on prescribing, quantitative and qualitative analyses of Synonyms usage are required to ascertain the impact Synonyms has on primary care prescribers, which will influence the continued maintenance and/or future development of this prescribing DSS. AIM: To determine the uptake of Synonyms and explore users' perceptions of its usefulness and future development. DESIGN AND SETTING: An exploratory sequential mixed-method observational study using quantitative questionnaires, followed by semi-structured interviews with primary care prescribers within NHS GG&C. METHOD: An electronic questionnaire (Questionnaire 1) accessible across 218 EMIS-compliant NHS GG&C GP practices ascertained Synonyms uptake by determining whether prescribers were aware of the DSS, whether they were aware of it and whether they used it. Prescribers who were aware of and used Synonyms were asked to opt in to participating further. This involved answering a second electronic questionnaire (Questionnaire 2), with the option of taking part in an additional one-to-one interview, to investigate their use and perceptions of Synonyms. RESULTS: Questionnaire 1 was completed by 201 respondents from 43.1% of eligible GP practices: 186 (92.5%) respondents were aware of Synonyms, of whom 163 (87.6%) had used it and 155 (83.3%) continued to use it. Questionnaire 2 was completed by 104 respondents: 90 (86.5%) indicated that Synonyms informed or influenced their choice of drug prescribed; 94 (90.4%) reported that Synonyms changed their prescribing choice towards medication on NHS GG&C formulary, and 104 (100%) reported that they trust Synonyms. Six interviews generated suggestions for improvements, mainly extending the clinical conditions listed. CONCLUSION: Most respondents were aware of and continued to use Synonyms. Respondents perceived Synonyms to influence prescribing choices towards local formulary medicines and improve adherence to local prescribing guidelines. Respondents trusted the DSS, but there is potential to increase awareness and training amongst non-users to encourage usage. Potentially, the NHS GG&C Synonyms function could be utilised by other health boards with supportive clinical systems.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/organização & administração , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido
18.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 56(3)2020 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32244930

RESUMO

The objective of this article is to discuss the inherent bias involved with artificial intelligence-based decision support systems for healthcare. In this article, the authors describe some relevant work published in this area. A proposed overview of solutions is also presented. The authors believe that the information presented in this article will enhance the readers' understanding of this inherent bias and add to the discussion on this topic. Finally, the authors discuss an overview of the need to implement transdisciplinary solutions that can be used to mitigate this bias.


Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Viés , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos
19.
Thorac Cancer ; 11(5): 1265-1270, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191394

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) provides physicians with evidence-based treatment options. This study was designed to explore the concordance of the suggested therapeutic regimen for advanced non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients between the updated version of WFO and physicians in our department, in order to reflect the differences of cancer treatment between China and the United States. METHODS: Retrospective data from 165 patients with advanced NSCLC from September 2014 to March 2018 were entered manually into WFO. WFO recommendations were provided in three categories: recommended, for consideration, and not recommended. Concordance was analyzed by comparing the treatment decisions proposed by WFO with the real treatment. Potential influenced factors were also analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, the treatment recommendations were concordant in 73.3% (121/165) of cases. When two alternative drugs such as icotinib and nedaplatin were included as "for consideration," the total consistency could be elevated from 73.3% to 90.3%(149/165). The logistic regression analysis showed that gender (P = 0.096), ECOG (P = 0.0.502), smoking (P = 0.455), and pathology (P = 0.633) had no effect on consistency, but stages (P = 0.019), including stage ≤III (77.8%, 21/27) and stage IV (93.5%, 129/138) had significant effects on consistency. CONCLUSIONS: In China, most of the treatment recommendations of WFO are consistent with the real world treatment. Factors such as patient preferences, prices, drug approval and medical insurance are also taken into consideration, and they ultimately affect the inconsistency. To be comprehensively and rapidly applied in China, localization needs to be accelerated by WFO.


Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial/tendências , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Seleção de Pacientes , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/patologia , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/terapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , China , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
20.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(5): 564-570, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32131910

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence to the contrary, many practitioners continue to inappropriately screen for and treat bacteria in the urine of clinically asymptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a new order set on the number of urine culture performed, antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), and associated financial impact. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental before-and-after intervention. SETTING: We conducted this study at 5 Catholic Health Initiative (CHI) hospitals in Texas that use the same electronic health record (EHR) system. PATIENTS: The study populations included adult patients who had urine culture performed from June 2017 to June 2019. INTERVENTION: The intervention (implemented June 25, 2018) was the addition of a new order set in the electronic health record that required practitioners to choose an indication for the type of urine study. The primary outcome was number of urine cultures performed adjusted for the number of total patient days. RESULTS: Following implementation of the new order set, the number of urine cultures performed among the 5 sites decreased from 1,175.8 tests per 10,000 patient days before the intervention to 701.4 after the intervention (40.4% reduction; P < .01). Antibiotic DOT for patients with a urinary tract infection indication decreased from 102.5 to 86.9 per 1,000 patient days (15.2% reduction; P < .01). The CAUTI standardized infection ratio was 1.0 before the intervention and 0.8 after the intervention (P = .23). The estimated yearly savings following the intervention was US$535,181. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a new order set resulted in decreases in the number of urine cultures performed and the antibiotic DOT, as well as substantial financial savings.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/métodos , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Urinárias , Urina/microbiologia , Catolicismo , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Religiosos , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Texas , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...